01
Define the outcome
We make the reason for the selection specific. That may be reducing manual work, improving reporting, supporting growth, replacing a failing system or giving managers a clearer route through a process.
HRIS selection consulting
Choose the right HR system with confidence
Choosing an HR system is difficult when your team has little time to compare options and the decision will be visible to the board. Copieux helps you define the work first, test the real requirements, and make a system decision you can explain.
Start with the situation
Who this is for
This is for CHROs, HR Directors and Heads of People in organisations of roughly 100 to 1,000 employees who are selecting an HRIS, replacing a system or trying to decide whether a current platform can still support the business.
You may be comparing vendor demonstrations while reports still disagree, managers are using workarounds and nobody has agreed what the system must make easier. A good selection process gives your team enough evidence to choose well without asking for a perfect specification or a long programme before the first decision.
A clear answer
How do you choose an HR system without wasting money?
Start with the work your team and managers need to do, the decisions the business needs to make, and the data those decisions depend on. Translate that into prioritised requirements, test vendors against real situations, and record the trade-offs so the final choice is clear and defensible.
How we help
Make the next decision easier.
02
Test the real requirements
We speak with the people who use, administer and rely on the system. This exposes exceptions, data needs, integrations and adoption concerns that a generic requirements list can miss.
03
Compare what matters
We structure demonstrations and evidence around your priority workflows. You can see where each platform fits, where configuration is needed and where a supplier claim needs further testing.
04
Prepare the decision
We give sponsors a short explanation of the options, cost drivers, delivery risks, dependencies and recommended next step. The decision stays with your team and is based on evidence.
What the engagement produces
You receive a prioritised requirements set, a practical evaluation approach, documented trade-offs and a recommendation that can be taken to the board or finance team.
What it does not require
It does not require a pre-selected vendor, a replacement decision before discovery, or a perfect future-state process.
Next step
Bring us the situation as it is.
We will help you work out what to fix, what to leave alone and which conversation should happen next.
Talk through your situation